About

About Proco

Everything for your brain.

One company covering focus, sleep, stress and mood. This page is about what we can prove, what we can't, and which of our products falls on which side of that line — because the second list is the one that tells you whether to trust the first.

Why we exist

The supplement industry has a transparency problem. Proprietary blends hide what you're actually taking. Doses get chosen for cost rather than effect. Marketing claims are everywhere and straight answers are hard to find.

We built Proco to be better than that, and we are not going to claim we have finished. One of our five products publishes every ingredient at its exact amount. Two have nothing to hide because they are effectively single-ingredient. Two carry proprietary blends whose individual amounts our manufacturer will not release — and we would rather tell you that on our own About page than let you discover it on a label.

The standard we hold ourselves to is full dose disclosure. We are not there across the range, and this page says where we are instead of describing around it.

Calm lake at sunrise

Where we actually stand

Five statements. Each one is checkable against a label or a page on this site, which is the only reason any of them are worth printing.

One product discloses every active at its individual amount: Sleep Formula. That is the only one that qualifies, and we won't claim otherwise about the range.
Cognitive Support and Sleep Support carry proprietary blends. Our manufacturer confirmed the individual amounts cannot be published. There is no timeline for that changing and we have stopped saying there is one.
We have no published certificates of analysis. No named testing laboratory, no accreditation scope, no third-party certification scheme. We removed testing claims from all five product pages in September 2026 for exactly this reason.
Disclosing a dose is not the same as matching the research, and the product that proves it is our most transparent one. Sleep Formula's chamomile is 100 mg against the 800 mg used in the trial we cite. We print both numbers.
We audited every article on this site against its own sources in 2026 and found roughly 170 errors. Eighty-two articles now carry a dated public correction saying what they previously claimed and what was wrong with it. That is an uncomfortable number to publish and it is the honest one.

What we won't write

No disease claims. Nothing we sell diagnoses, treats, cures or prevents any condition, and we won't imply otherwise however a reader arrives at the page.

No dose characterisations of doses we don't disclose. We will not call the amounts inside those two blends modest, targeted or clinically dosed, because we don't know them — and describing a number you won't print is the oldest trick in the category.

No implied certifications. Until we can point you at a document, we don't claim one.

And where the evidence for an ingredient is weak, mixed, or confined to populations unlike you, we say so in our writing rather than leaving it out — including when that argues against buying from us.

JM
"Brain health is the newest trend in supplements, which is exactly why we are careful with it. The test of an evidence claim isn't what a company says when the research helps — it's what it publishes when the research doesn't. So we print the dose gaps, we correct our own articles in public, and where we can't tell you something, we say that instead of describing around it."
— Johnny Meagher, Founder

See the science

Real ingredients. Real doses. The gaps marked as gaps.

See the Science Or read how we check a claim, and what we do when we get one wrong. Prescriber, pharmacist or therapist? The composition reference is written for you — every dose we have, the two products where we don't, and the interactions that matter.